McCauley

(PC) Gustard v. McCauley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20202:17-cv-00012California1,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER GUSTARD, No. 2:17-cv-0012-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KAMALA HARRIS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a federal inmate proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 31, 2020, the court granted in full defendant Morazzini’s motion to dismiss, and granted in part defendants McKinney and McCauley’ motions to dismiss. ECF No. 87. Though numerous potentially cognizable claims remain, defendants have yet to file a responsive pleading in accordance with Rule 12(a)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Several motions filed by plaintiff, however, remain pending, including: (1) a Motion for Certification of Constitutional Challenge to State Statutes and Regulations (ECF No. 77); (2) a “Notice of Dismissal” as to certain claims in the operative complaint (ECF No. 82); (3) a Motion for Approval to Appeal an Order (ECF No. 88); and (4) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.