(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20202:19-cv-01663California2,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2:19-cv-01663-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Charles Head (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an action under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (“§ 2520”) for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (“Title III” or “Wiretap Act”) against the County of Sacramento (the “County”) and Kenneth Shelton (“Shelton”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) The magistrate judge screened the Complaint and recommended through the Findings and 27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.