Allison

(PC) Lamon v. Allison

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20202:18-cv-02218California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2:18-cv-02218-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon’s (“Plaintiff”) “Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment and/or, in the Alternative, Rule 60(b)(6) Motion to Vacate the Judgment.” (ECF No. 45.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 15, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismissed it for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 8(a). (ECF No. 13.) However, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (Id.) On March 25, 2019,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.