Rill

(HC) Cross v. Rill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20201:18-cv-00821California510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JEROME LEE CROSS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00821-NONE-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE RICK RILL, OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Respondent. 14 Petitioner Jerome Lee Cross, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 2, 2020, the court received a notification that a mailing for petitioner had been returned as undeliverable. On May 15, 2020, the court ordered that petitioner show cause within 30 days why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff has not responded. We thus recommend that the case be dismissed. Petitioner is required to keep the court apprised of his current address. Local Rule 183(b) provides that “[i]f mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.