(PC) Driver v. ADA 1824 Panels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20201:19-cv-01718California718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR, No. 1:19-cv-01718-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ADA 1824 PANELS, et al., (Doc. Nos. 4, 8) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Billy Driver Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 16, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be ordered to pay the required $400.00 filing fee in full in order to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 8.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty (30) days after service. (Id. at 4.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.