(PC)Rivera

(PC)Rivera v. Suisun City Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20202:19-cv-00920California361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JASON RIVERA, No. 2:19-cv-0920-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SUISUN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 8, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, a potentially cognizable excessive force claim against defendant Maccabe, but had not alleged any viable claims against defendants Suisun City Police Department, O’Brien, Zaragoza, and Heine. ECF No. 11. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the viable claim only or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the viable claim against defendant Maccabe. ECF No. 16. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge. ///// ///// 28 2 LUV VEY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.