(HC) Vochatzer v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20202:20-cv-01156California1,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER VOCHATZER, No. 2:20-cv-1156 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER and MATTHEW ATCHLEY, WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct a preliminary review of all petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Pursuant to Rule 4, this court must summarily dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” The

A federal petition for writ of habeas corpus must name as respondent the state officer having custody…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.