Gilliam
Gilliam v. O'Neill
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20201:19-cv-01711California1,939 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM JESSE GILLIAM, Case No. 1:19-cv-01711-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING
v. DEFENDANTS ELIZABETH DIAZ AND
PHIL LARSON FOR FAILURE TO SERVE
BARBARA HOPE O’NEILL, et al., IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 4(m) OF
THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
Defendants. PROCEDURE AND FAILURE TO OBEY A
COURT ORDER
13 (ECF No. 17)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 William Jesse Gilliam (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Barbara Hope O’Neill, the County of Fresno, Phil Larson, Susan B. Anderson, Henry R. Perea, Judy Case McNairy, Deporah Poochigian, Andreas Boregas, Buddy Mendez, Brian Pacheco, Ken Taniguchi, and Elizabeth Diaz (“Defendants”) based on delays in bringing him to trial on allegations that he was a sexually violent predator. On December 11, 2019, summonses and the order setting the mandatory scheduling…