Hicks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, No. 1:19-cv-01738-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

D.HICKS, et al., (Doc. Nos. 12, 17, 21) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed a motion “in support of 42 USC 2000(d)” on January 8, 2020. (Doc. No. 11.) On January 8, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations construing plaintiff’s motion as a motion for a preliminary injunction and recommending that the motion be denied. (Doc. No. 12 at 1.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff filed objections on January 24, 2020. (Doc. No.…