Macomber

(HC) Stewart v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20201:20-cv-00221California662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY W. STEWART, No. 1:20-cv-00221-DAD-EPG (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

J. MACOMBER, et al., (Doc. No. 6) Respondents.

16 Petitioner Gregory W. Stewart is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. On February 25, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendation recommending that the pending petition be dismissed as an unauthorized successive petition. (Doc. No. 6.) The findings and recommendation were served on petitioner and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of that order’s date of service. (Id. at 3–4.) On March 4, 2020, petitioner filed timely objections. (Doc. No. 8.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.