Ramirez-Castellanos

Ramirez-Castellanos v. Nugget Market, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20202:17-cv-01025California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY DAVID RAMIREZ- No. 2:17-cv-01025 JAM AC CASTELLANOS, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 NUGGET MARKET, INC., et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Pending before the court is a motion for discovery by defendants Issa Quarra and Building Maintenance Group, ECF No. 119, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(1). The motion was filed on May 29, 2020. The undersigned struck the brief as non-comlpliant with Local Rule 251(c), and ordered a joint statement to be filed on or before June 24, 2020. ECF No. 120. No joint statement has been filed. Local Rule 251(b) establishes the requirements for any party bringing a motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, including the requirement that the parties meet and confer and file a joint discovery statement. Here, no joint discovery statement has been filed, despite a specific warning that failure to file a joint statement would result in denial of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.