Hoffman

Hoffman v. Jelly Belly Candy Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20202:19-cv-01935California1,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOWARD HOFFMAN, as an No. 2:19-cv-01935-JAM-DB individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO STAY ACTION 10 v.

JELLY BELLY CANDY COMPANY,

INC., Defendant. 14 This matter is before the Court on Jelly Belly Candy Company, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Stay. Defendant contends that a stay is appropriate in this case pending resolution by the United States Supreme Court of Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Appeal No. 19-631 and, possibly, Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, Appeal No. 19-511. See Mot. at 3–5, ECF No. 15. Howard Hoffman (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion, Opp’n, ECF No. 16, to which Defendant replied, Reply, ECF No. 18. After consideration of the parties’ briefing on the motion and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Stay.1

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.