Asman

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20202:20-cv-00195California5,618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER A. ASMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 22, 23, 33) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss, to which plaintiffs have responded, as well as plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the Clerk’s denial of plaintiffs’ request to enter default against defendant Golding. (ECF Nos. 22, 23, 33.) A hearing on these motions was held on June 17, 2020. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiffs appeared at the hearing individually, and Jennifer Nygaard appeared for defendants. As set forth below, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendants’ motions to dismiss and DENIES plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider. //// //// ////

1 Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, and this action is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). 28 BACKGROUND2 This matter concerns the death of William…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.