Strain/Hall

(PC) Easley v. Strain/Hall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20202:20-cv-00103California441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEVEN JEROME EASLEY, No. 2:20-cv-0103-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

TYWANDA STRAIN/HALL, et. al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a Sacramento County jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 28, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 21. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.