Stevenson

(PC) Vis v. Stevenson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20202:20-cv-00987California3,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTOPHER VIS, No. 2:20-cv-0987 DB P Plaintiff,

v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STEVENSON, et al.. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, finds plaintiff has not stated any cognizable claims, and gives plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint. In addition, this court recommends dismissal of one defendant. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.