Kernan

(PC) Bisel v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20201:18-cv-00090California763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, No. 1:18-cv-00090-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., (Doc. No. 19) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Gregory Eugene Bisel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 5, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s lack of standing to bring suit under California Proposition 57. (Doc. No. 15.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days after service. (Id. at 8.) Plaintiff timely filed objections on May 2, 2019. (Doc. No. 16.) On June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.