(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20201:17-cv-00817California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-NONE-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS v. EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER AND JASPAL RANDHAWA’S MOTION TO RICHARD B. HAAK, M.D., et al., DISMISS/REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL Defendants. JURISDICTION BE GRANTED 14 (ECF NO. 117)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this case. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which was filed on July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 19). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s state tort claims for medical negligence against defendants Haak, Randhawa, and Emanuel Medical Center, and his state tort claims for battery against defendants Haak and Emanuel Medical Center. (ECF No. 21, p. 2; ECF No. 95,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.