Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20201:19-cv-00138California701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KYLE PETERSEN , Case No.: 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. INFORMING THE COURT OF PLAINTIFF’S

ATTEMPT TO USE ADMINISTRATIVE

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., and NICHOLAS REMEDIES

TORRES,

Defendants. (ECF No. 36)

15

Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion informing the court of Plaintiff’s attempt to use administrative remedies. (ECF No. 36.) The Court will deny the motion. Plaintiff represents in this motion that he initiated a grievance process by submitting an inmate request “to staff, to the Acting Captain at FCC Lompoc” and that Plaintiff was forced to use his own paper in doing so because staff in Lompoc’s SHU refused to give Plaintiff a FBOP form. (Id.) Plaintiff further represents that in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.