Matevousian

(PC) Pitts v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20201:19-cv-01029California1,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDGAR NELSON PITTS, 1:19-cv-01029-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTON AND/OR TEMPORARY

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., RESRAINING ORDER BE DENIED (ECF No. 17.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

18 I. BACKGROUND Edgar Nelson Pitts (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on July 29, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On January 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order, which is now before the court. (ECF No. 17.) II. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has personal jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.