(PS) Pierson v. Sutter Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20202:20-cv-00124California3,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III, No. 2:20-cv-124-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING; AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SUTTER HEALTH, et al., (ECF No. 14.) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raymond H. Pierson, III, proceeding pro se, alleges claims against Sutter Health and a number of the Hospital’s employees. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff contends certain individuals in the Hospital’s employ conspired against him after he complained about other physicians’ actions, setting up a “sham” peer-review process regarding plaintiff’s practice that led to his suspension. Plaintiff raises claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his civil rights, as well as claims under a number of California state laws. The Hospital now moves to dismiss, arguing plaintiff’s Section 1983 claims fail for lack of state action, and requesting the court decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.