Sandhu

(HC) Sandhu v. Sandhu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20201:20-cv-00830California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAKSHMI SINGH SANDHU, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00830-JLT (HC) ) Petitioner, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO ) DISMISS PETITION FOR LACK OF v. ) JURISDICTION ) KAPUR CASTRO SANDHU, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Respondent. ) ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE ) ) [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE]

On June 15, 2020, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. Because the petition is successive, the Court will recommend it be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief." Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see also Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 491 (9th Cir. 1990). A petition for habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.