(PS) Moore v. County of Sacramento, Dept.of Child, Family and Adult Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS T. MOORE, and No. 2:19-cv-844-JAM-KJN PS
KRISTINA A. MOORE,
ORDER Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 23, 27.) v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD, FAMILY
AND ADULT SERVICES,
16 Defendant.
18 On May 14, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 27), 19 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On May 28, 2020 plaintiffs 21 filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 28), which have been considered 22 by the court. 23 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 24 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 25 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 26 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection…