Dileo

(PC) Millner v. Dileo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20201:17-cv-00507California1,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES MILLNER, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00507-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) OBJECTIONS, AND DENYING MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

DR. DILEO, et al., ) ) [ECF Nos. 73, 74] Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff James Millner is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 55.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion and motion for reconsideration of the Court’s June 18, 2020, order, filed on June 29, 2020, respectively. On June 17, 2020, Defendants filed a request to extend the dispositive motion deadline. Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motion and argues that Defendants have had ample time to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.