Pfeiffer

(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20201:18-cv-01336California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 1:18-cv-01336-NONE-GSA-PC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING vs. THIS CASE AS BARRED BY HECK V. HUMPHREY, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) AND

C. PFEIFFER, et al., EDWARDS v. BALISOK, 520 U.S. 641 (1997)

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE Defendants. THIS CASE 15 (Doc. Nos. 23, 28.) 16

Plaintiff Cedric Lynn Struggs is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 14, 2020, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that this case be dismissed as barred by the favorable termination rule of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997), without prejudice to plaintiff’s filing a petition for writ of habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.