Mendoza

Mendoza v. Macy's Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20201:19-cv-01156California881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RENEE C. MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01156-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY v. WITH THE COURT'S ORDER AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

MACY’S INC.,

(Docs. 1, 4, 13) Defendant. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

14 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) against Defendant Macy’s Inc. on August 23, 2019. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, which was granted on September 4, 2019. (Docs. 2, 3.) On September 20, 2019, the undersigned issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims and granted Plaintiff twenty-one days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.