(PC) Eric O'Dell v. Cheryl Mims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20201:20-cv-00378California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC O’DELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00378-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v.

DEFENDANTS

C. MIMS, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

17 30-DAY DEADLINE 18 On June 18, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found that it states cognizable claims of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendant Mims, as well as cognizable claims of medical negligence against Defendants Mims, Doe #1, and Doe #2. (Doc. 11.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s remaining claims were not cognizable. (Id.) Therefore, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable and to dismiss the remaining claims and defendants. (Id. at 11.) 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.