Fisher

(PC) Hunter v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20201:19-cv-00625California1,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HUNTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00625-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

v. (ECF No. 49)

FISHER, et al., ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RE-

SERVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUDGMENT WITH RAND WARNING TO

PLAINTIFF’S CORRECT ADDRESS OF

RECORD

SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT (ECF No. 52) 19 Plaintiff Nathan Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Cui,1 Thompson, Fisher, and Hernandez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Procedural Background On June 8, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.