Magee

Magee v. County of Tuolumne

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20201:19-cv-01522California1,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOPE MAGEE, individually and as Case No. 1:19-cv-01522-AWI-BAM Successor in Interest to JACOREY SHAW, deceased; PAUL SHAW, individually and ORDER VACATING HEARING as Successor in Interest to JACOREY SHAW, deceased, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 27) v.

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, a municipal entity, and COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants.

20 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Hope Magee and Paul Shaw’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). (Doc. No. 27.) Defendant County of Stanislaus filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to amend on May 28, 2020. (Doc. No. 28.) Defendant County of Tuolumne filed a statement of conditional non-opposition to the motion to amend on June 4, 2020. Defendant County of Tuolumne does not oppose the motion to amend. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.