Sahota

(PC) Hollis v. Sahota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20202:13-cv-01841California1,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, No. 2:13-cv-1841-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Shortly after filing his complaint, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. ECF Nos. 3 & 4. On May 21, 2014, before any defendant was served, the undersigned magistrate judge denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the “three-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismissed the case without prejudice to re-filing upon prepayment of the $400 filing fee. ECF No. 10. On June 27, 2014, plaintiff appealed the order dismissing this action. ECF No. 12. On July 9, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for relief from judgment. ECF No. 14. On July 11, 2014, the undersigned denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.