Cortes

Cortes v. National Credit Adjusters, L.L.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20202:16-cv-00823California5,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE CORTES, on behalf of himself No. 2:16-cv-00823-MCE-EFB and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.

NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS,

L.L.C., Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Mike Cortes (“Plaintiff”) brought a class action lawsuit against Defendant National Credit Adjusters, L.L.C. (“Defendant”) for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788 et seq. (“Rosenthal Act”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, which Defendant does not oppose. ECF Nos. 49, 52. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.1 /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.