(PS) Bledsoe v. Facebook
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 2:18-cv-2756-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FACEBOOK; MARK ZUCKERBERG, Defendants. 16 The court previously granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint. Shortly after filing a first amended complaint, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint which is screened herein. ECF No. 7. As discussed below, the second amended complaint fails to state a claim and must also be dismissed. As previously explained to plaintiff, although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), a complaint, or portion thereof, should be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it fails to set forth “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” …