Baughman

(HC) Morris v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20202:19-cv-00661California400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CONDALEE MORRIS, No. 2:19-cv-0661-TLN-EFB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID BAUGHMAN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 12, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 25. On June 11, 2020, the court informed petitioner of the requirements for filing an opposition to any motion to dismiss. That order gave petitioner 21 days to file an opposition or statement of non- opposition and warned petitioner that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 21 days have passed and petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition nor otherwise responded to the May 12, 2020, order. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 12, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. These findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.