Harris

Harris v. Placer County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20202:19-cv-01139California1,343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN A. HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-01139-MCE-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER PLACER COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brought this civil action. The complaint was dismissed for failure to statue a claim and judgment has been entered. See ECF Nos. 11 and 12. Pending before the court in this closed case are plaintiff’s: (1) motion to vacate and for reconsideration, see ECF No. 13; and (2) motion for appointment of counsel, see ECF No. 16. In his motion to vacate the Court’s final judgment and for reconsideration, plaintiff states that relief is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See ECF No. 13, pg. 1. The Court may grant reconsideration of a final judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately brought under Rule 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.