Komar

Project Sentinel v. Komar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20201:19-cv-00708California6,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 19-CV-00708 DAD-EPG Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL AND AWARDING EXPENSES

TO PLAINTIFF UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

14 MEYER KOMAR; JEANETTE KOMAR; 37(a)(5) and SARAH KOMAR, (ECF No. 46) Defendants.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Project Sentinel’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 46.) In the motion, Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses from defendant Meyer Komar (“Mr. Komar” or “Defendant”) to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and first request for production of documents. Plaintiff also requests that Mr. Komar be ordered to pay Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion to compel. Finally, Plaintiff requests that the Court enter an order precluding Mr. Komar from using undisclosed evidence and warning Mr. Komar that his ongoing refusal to comply with discovery rules and the Court’s orders may lead to entry of default against him. (Id. at 2.) Neither Mr. Komar, nor the other defendants, have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.