Komar
Project Sentinel v. Komar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 19-CV-00708 DAD-EPG Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. COMPEL AND AWARDING EXPENSES
TO PLAINTIFF UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
14 MEYER KOMAR; JEANETTE KOMAR; 37(a)(5) and SARAH KOMAR, (ECF No. 46) Defendants.
17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Project Sentinel’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 46.) In the motion, Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses from defendant Meyer Komar (“Mr. Komar” or “Defendant”) to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and first request for production of documents. Plaintiff also requests that Mr. Komar be ordered to pay Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion to compel. Finally, Plaintiff requests that the Court enter an order precluding Mr. Komar from using undisclosed evidence and warning Mr. Komar that his ongoing refusal to comply with discovery rules and the Court’s orders may lead to entry of default against him. (Id. at 2.) Neither Mr. Komar, nor the other defendants, have…