Rodriguez

(PC) Cruz v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20201:20-cv-00763California647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, No. 1:20-cv-00763-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

C. RODRIGUEZ, et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 4)

17 Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 4, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) be denied because plaintiff had suffered three or more prior strike dismissals and that plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full for this action. (Doc. No. 4.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.