Salazar

(PC) Bland v. Salazar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20201:19-cv-01499California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, UNDER THE v. NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE, UNDER THE RULE OF NECESSITY, IPSO

DOE, JORE, INTER ALIA

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 25) 15 16 17 Joshua D. Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff’s motion will be denied because there is nothing for the Court to reconsider. Plaintiff appears to ask the Court to reconsider the dismissal of his common law copyright claim, but the Court did not dismiss this claim. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on October 18, 2019. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff asserted Fourteenth Amendment claims based on a failure to return his hearing aids and a violation of his common law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.