Burnes

(PC) Henley v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20201:19-cv-01101California1,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZURI HENLEY, No. 1:19-cv-01101-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

SGT. BURNES, et al., REOPENING CASE Defendants. (Doc. No. 19) 16 17 Plaintiff Zuri Henley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 8, 2020, the court adopted in full the March 9, 2020 findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge. (Doc. Nos. 13, 17.) In that order adopting the findings and recommendations, the court dismissed the action due to Henley’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit in federal court. (Doc. No. 17.) On June 11, 2020, plaintiff moved for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.