(PC)Wright

(PC)Wright v. Hansan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:17-cv-00260California680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL WEBSTER WRIGHT, No. 2:17-cv-260-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in a civil action. On February 12, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint. ECF No. 21. The court determined, in relevant part, that plaintiff had stated a viable claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act “against the California Department of Corrections, California State Prison- Sacramento, and its ‘Reasonable Accommodations Panel’ for refusing him single-cell status.” Id. at 2. Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) filed an answer on September 13, 2019. ECF No. 28. However, the United States Marshal was unable to effect service of process on defendants California State Prison, Sacramento (“CSP, Sac”) and the CSP-Sac Reasonable Accommodations Panel (“RAP”). ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.