Simmons

(PC) Harrell v. Simmons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:19-cv-01838California1,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, No. 2:19-cv-01838-TLN-AC Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

ANTUAN SIMMONS, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Joshua Neil Harrell’s (“Plaintiff”) “Objections” to the magistrate judge’s order filed April 27, 2020 (ECF No. 19), which the Court construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this civil rights action on September 13, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) In the Findings and Recommendations issued on September 18, 2019, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff was precluded from bringing this action in forma pauperis because he was a three-strikes litigant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and there was no imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing. (ECF No. 5 at 3.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.