Spearman
(PC) Villegas v. Spearman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLFO VILLEGAS, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-01539-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. SPEARMAN, Warden, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Rudolfo Villegas, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 15.) On June 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 18.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d…