Kushner

(PS) Lorretz v. Kushner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:19-cv-01969California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANA LEE WALLACH LORRETZ, No. 2:19-cv-01969-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER MR. AND MRS. JARED KUSHNER, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se with the above- entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 2, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 7.) The thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.