Salas

Salas v. Alsco Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:20-cv-00064California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO RODARTE SALAS, as an No. 2:20-cv-00064 WBS AC individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER v. ALSCO INC., dba STEINER CORPORATION, a Nevada company; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 13-1), is APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will decide the matter related to that request to seal. 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only be sealed by a written order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.