Lizarraga

(PC) Strand v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:18-cv-02624California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD LEE STRAND, No. 2:18-cv-2624 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOE A. LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned shall recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. By order issued May 4, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. (See ECF No. 10). At that time, he was given sixty days either to amend the complaint or to inform the court that he wished to proceed only on the cognizable claims identified in the court’s screening order. (See id. at 17). More…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.