(PS) Sellers v. City of Davis Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20202:20-cv-00875California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAY L. SELLERS, No. 2:20-cv-00875-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF DAVIS POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ESPRESSO ROMA

INC., PINE TREE GARDENS, US

ATTORNEY FOR EASTERN

CALIFORNIA, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Jay L. Sellers (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, filed the instant action on April 28, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 12, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Neither party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.1

Plaintiff, however, did file a document styled as a “Motion to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice.” ECF No. 9. Plaintiff’s filing is not responsive to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.