Kernan

(HC) Bland v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20201:18-cv-01141California764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, No. 1:18-cv-01141-DAD-EPG-HC Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

KEN CLARK, APPEALABILITY Respondent. (Doc. No. 61) 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 31, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendation recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition be dismissed as untimely. (Doc. No. 50.) On April 14, 2020, the court dismissed the petition and entered judgment. (Doc. Nos. 59, 60.) On June 8, 2020, petitioner filed the instant motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 61.) The court construes the motion for reconsideration as having been filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Constr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.