Jewell
Jewell v. Francis III
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20201:18-cv-01460California139 words
Trial Court Opinion
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KAREN JEWELL, ) Case No.: 1:18-CV-01460-DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING CASE v. ) ) ( Doc. 32) ) ) W ILLIAM MONCRIEF FRANCIS III, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
16
The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 32) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22 Dated: July 8, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28