Jewell

Jewell v. Francis III

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20201:18-cv-01460California139 words

Trial Court Opinion

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

KAREN JEWELL, ) Case No.: 1:18-CV-01460-DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING CASE v. ) ) ( Doc. 32) ) ) W ILLIAM MONCRIEF FRANCIS III, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

16

The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 32) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 Dated: July 8, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28