German

(PC) Harris v. German

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20201:15-cv-01462California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B HARRIS, 1:15-cv-01462-DAD-GSA (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

HUMBERTO GERMAN, et al., (Document# 93)

Defendants.

16 On June 25, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 93.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require an attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 1816 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to § 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek volunteer counsel only in the most serious and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.