(HC) Lupercio v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20201:20-cv-00925California1,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON NAVARRO LUPERCIO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00925-JDP Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE

v.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ECF No. 1 15 Respondent. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS CASE

17 Petitioner Ramon Navarro Lupercio, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. This matter is before us for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, a district court must dismiss a habeas petition if it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). Courts have “an active role in summarily disposing of facially defective habeas petitions” under Rule 4. Ross v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.