(PC) Robinson v. Solano County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20202:18-cv-01131California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SABRINA ROBINSON, No. 2:18-cv-1131 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 6). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). By order issued April 7, 2020, plaintiff was directed to submit an updated application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. (See ECF No. 8). The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted an updated in forma pauperis application or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the April 7, 2020, order was returned to the court as undeliverable on April 29, 2020, plaintiff was properly served. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.