(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20202:20-cv-00725California627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-cv-0725 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA COURTS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned shall recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to file an in forma pauperis application and, in the alternative, for failure to pay the appropriate filing fee. Since the filing of plaintiff’s complaint in April 2020, plaintiff has twice been formally ordered to file a proper in forma pauperis application, and he has twice been sent a copy of the in forma pauperis application. (See ECF Nos. 3, 12). Each time, plaintiff has been given thirty days within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.